Archive for March, 2009

What robots are teaching us about eye contact

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

After a speech I gave last month on “The Nonverbal Advantage,” an audience member asked me why eye contact is so important.

I told her that eye contact is powerful because it is instinctive and connected with humans’ early survival patterns. Children who could attract and maintain eye contact, and therefore increase attention, had the best chance of being fed and cared for. Today, infants are still found to be very sensitive to eye direction, especially distinguishing between eyes that are looking at them and eyes that are looking away.

In our professional lives, too little eye contact can be interpreted as being impolite, insincere, or even dishonest. One hospital, analyzing letters of complaints from patients, reported that 90 percent of the complaints had to do with poor doctor eye contact, which was perceived as a “lack of caring.”

Now even robots are showing that eye contact makes a difference . . .

Scientists from Carnegie Mellon University in collaboration with researchers from Japan’s Osaka University and from ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication Laboratory found that a robot’s eye movement is key to guiding the flow of a conversation with more than one person. This finding could prove particularly useful for robots that act as receptionists in buildings or malls, or as guides for museums or parks, the scientists say.

In the findings, presented at the 2009 IEEE Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) conference, in La Jolla, California, the robot used for the experiments, called Robovie, was given the ability to combine gaze with speech. Researchers first developed a model of the way that people use their eyes during a conversation or a discussion and then incorporated this data into the software that controls Robovie in different conversational settings.

With Robovie playing the part of a travel agent, three conversational scenarios were tested: addressing one participant while ignoring the other; addressing one participant while acknowledging the other as a bystander with quick glances; and addressing both participants equally, with equal amounts of eye contact.

The team found that Robovie was able to guide the flow of a conversation effectively. When the robot looked equally at both people, they took turns speaking. Those at whom Robovie only glanced spoke less, and those who were ignored completely spoke the least. This pattern was consistent about 97 percent of the time.

5 Mistakes People Make Reading Body Language

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Human beings are genetically programmed to look for facial and behavioral cues and to quickly understand their meaning. We see someone gesture and automatically make a judgment about the intention of that gesture.

And we’ve been doing this for a long, long time. As a species we knew how to win friends and influence people – or avoid/placate/confront those we couldn’t befriend – long before we knew how to use words.

But our ancient ancestors faced threats and challenges very different from those we confront in today’s modern society. Life is more complex now, with layers of social restrictions and nuanced meanings adding to the intricacies of our interpersonal dealings. This is especially true in workplace settings, where corporate culture adds it own complexities and unique guidelines for correct behavior.

No matter what the culture at your workplace, the ability to “read” nonverbal signals can provide some significant advantages in the way you deal with people. You can start to gain those advantages by avoiding these five common mistakes people often make when reading body language:

1) They forget to consider the context.

Imagine this scene: It’s a freezing-cold winter evening with a light snow falling and a north wind blowing. You see a woman sitting on a bench at a bus stop. Her head is down, her eyes are tightly closed and she’s hunched over, shivering slightly, and hugging herself.

Now the scene changes . . .

It’s the same woman in the same physical position. But instead of sitting outdoors on a bench, she’s seated behind her desk in the office next to yours. Her body language is identical – head down, eyes closed, hunched over, shivering, hugging herself. The nonverbal signals are the same but the new setting has altered your perception of those signals. In a flash she’s gone from telling you, “I’m really cold!” to “I’m in distress.”

Obviously, then, the meaning of nonverbal communication changes as the context changes. We can’t begin to understand someone’s behavior without considering the circumstances under which the behavior occurred.

2) They try to find meaning in a single gesture.

Nonverbal cues occur in what is called a “gesture cluster” – a group of movements, postures and actions that reinforce a common point. A single gesture can have several meanings or mean nothing at all (sometimes a cigar is just a cigar), but when you couple that single gesture with other nonverbal signals, the meaning becomes clearer.

For example, a person may cross her arms for any number of reasons. But when that action is coupled with a scowl, a headshake, and legs turned away from you, you now have a composite picture and reinforcement to conclude that she is resistant to whatever you just proposed.

3) They are too focused on what’s being said.

If you only hear what people are saying, you’ll miss what they really mean.

A manager I was coaching appeared calm and reasonable as she listed the reasons why she should delegate more responsibility to her staff. But every time she expressed these opinions, she also (almost imperceptibly) shuddered. While her words declared her intention of empowering employees, the quick, involuntary shudder was saying loud and clear, “I really don’t want to do this!”

4) They don’t know a person’s baseline.

You need to know how a person normally behaves so that you can spot meaningful deviations.

Here’s what can happen when you don’t: A few years ago, I was giving a presentation to the CEO of a financial services company, outlining a speech I was scheduled to deliver to his leadership team the next day. And it wasn’t going well.

Our meeting lasted almost an hour, and through that entire time the CEO sat at the conference table with his arms tightly crossed. He didn’t once smile, lean forward or nod encouragement. When I finished, he said thank you (without making eye contact) and left the room.

As I’m a body language expert, I was sure that his nonverbal communication was telling me that my speaking engagement would be canceled. But when I walked to the elevator, the executive’s assistant came to tell me how impressed her boss had been with my presentation. I was shocked and asked how he would have reacted had he not liked it. “Oh,” said the assistant, her smile acknowledging that she had previously seen that reaction as well. “He would have gotten up in the middle of your presentation and walked out!”

The only nonverbal signals that I had received from that CEO were ones I judged to be negative. What I didn’t realize was that, for this individual, this was normal behavior.

5) They judge body language through the bias of their own culture:

When we talk about culture, we’re generally talking about a set of shared values that a group of people holds. And while some of a culture’s values are taught explicitly, most of them are absorbed subconsciously – at a very early age. Such values affect how members of the group think and act and, more importantly, the kind of criteria by which they judge others. Cultural meanings render some nonverbal behaviors as normal and right and others as strange or wrong. From greetings to hand gestures to the use of space and touch, what’s proper and correct in one culture may be ineffective – or even offensive – in another.

For example, in North America, the correct way to wave hello and good-bye is palm out, fingers extended, with the hand moving side to side. That same gesture means “no” throughout Mediterranean Europe and Latin America.  In Peru it means “come here,” and in Greece, where it’s called the moutza, the gesture is a serious insult. The closer the hand to the other person’s face, in fact, the more threatening it is considered to be.

So just remember: Body language cues are undeniable. But to accurately decode them, they need to be understood in context, viewed in clusters, evaluated in relation to what is being said, assessed for consistency, and filtered for cultural influences. If you do so, you’ll be well on your way to gaining the nonverbal advantage!

Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D., is a professional speaker, executive coach, and the author of THE NONVERBAL ADVANTAGE – Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work. Carol’s programs on this topic include: The Nonverbal Advantage (general business audience), The Nonverbal Advantage in Sales, The Silent Language of Leadership, and Body Language for Women Who Mean Business.   For information about booking Carol to speak at your next event,, contact her by phone: 510-526-1727, email: CGoman@CKG.com, or through her web sites: www.NonverbalAdvantage.com.

Body Language and the Job Interview

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

During these tough economic times, many people will be out in droves looking for jobs.  After the initial screening process, the interview comes next.  There are many nonverbal cues that potential employers will pick up on if you’re not conscious of your actions.  Work on controlling your body language and you will help control the direction of the interview.  Read on for a few tips regarding the interview process.

Maintain Eye Contact

Eye contact is of vital importance when it comes to the job interview.  It demonstrates confidence and trustworthiness, and can seriously affect the outcome of the interview itself.  A lack of eye contact can sabotage the interview process and ultimately your chances at landing the job.

Don’t Cross Legs

While some people may think that crossing legs shows that you are comfortable and relaxed, this is not the time or place for crossing legs.  Crossing legs is seen as especially inappropriate for women as well.  Keep both feet on the floor and refrain from shifting leg positions.  You will have plenty of time to stretch and cross your legs when the interview is over and you’re behind your own desk.

Handshake

The quality of a handshake can say a lot about who you are.  You want to be firm, but friendly.  Loose handshakes, ultra-firm handshakes, and informal handshakes can send the wrong message to your potential employer.  Be all business and shake hands like a professional.

Remain Still

Remaining still may be difficult to do when you’re nervous, but it will help your interviewer’s perception of you.  Fidgeting and excessive gesturing can be distracting to say the least.  Be calm and still; exercise your control over yourself and take some deep breaths when you have the urge to shift in your seat.

Good Posture

Good posture helps convey confidence to your potential employer.  Sit upright with your back erect and don’t slouch.  Bad posture can either communicate a lack of confidence or even laziness.  Be cognizant of your posture, keep breathing, and actively engage in your interview.  Your body language speaks volumes, whether you open your mouth or not.

This post was contributed by Courtney Phillips, who writes about the best online college degrees – http://onlinecollegedegree.org. She welcomes your feedback at CourtneyPhillips80 at gmail.com

What Does Your Office Say About You?

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Have you noticed that executives often communicate their attitudes about power and status by the way they utilize their office space?

Here’s what I mean: If you walk into someone’s office and find a conversation area (chairs of equal size set around a small table – or at right angles to each other), you’ll probably infer that the occupant likes to speak with guests more casually and personally than he or she could from behind a desk. That office layout “tells” you that the person is informal and most likely collaborative. On the other hand, the message you get from someone who conducts all interactions from behind a large desk, with his or her guests seated in smaller (and almost always more uncomfortable) chairs stationed in front of the desk, is one of control or superiority.

Not everyone is an executive and not all workspaces have enough room for a separate conversation site. But many offices could be made more inviting to guests simply by moving the visitor’s chair to the side, rather than in front of the desk.

Savvy leaders know that their office layout may be viewed as a metaphor for business relationships. That’s why many successful professionals choose not to speak with clients, customers, or employees from behind a desk, but instead come around their desk and sit next to them. A manager in a manufacturing company uses this strategy with new employees: “When I first meet with members of my staff, I pull my chair to the opposite side of the desk so that we are sitting next to one another. I tell them that sometimes I may physically be seated behind my desk, but that this is the way I think of us – as partners working side by side.”

I’m not suggesting that sitting next to staff members is all that a manager needs to do to communicate inclusion. But it’s a start.

Contrast that with the senior project manager who conducted meetings in his office by placing a worktable perpendicular to the front of his desk. He sat in a comfortable chair behind his desk while the rest of the “team” sat in armless chairs at the table. This arrangement allowed the manager to reinforce his role as the authority figure in the room. In the words of one participant in those meetings, “There he’d be, leaning back in his big chair, while the rest of us sat upright at the table. We felt like peasants who’d been summoned by the Lord of the Manor!”

Office arrangements are important as symbolic cues – and we human beings are more strongly influenced by symbols than anything we read or hear.

As a change-management consultant, I’ve seen the powerful role that symbols play when an organization is going through transformation. And I’ve come to realize that most leaders don’t understand how to harness that power. For example, one organization I worked with was filled with symbols of executive privilege (corporate dining room, executive washrooms, reserved parking spaces, etc.). All of that would have been fine – except for the fact that a large part of the stated change message was: “We’re all in this together!”

Now, if that company really wanted to get the “together” message across, its leaders should have been practicing open door policies, roaming the corporate halls and factory floors, parking in employee lots and eating in the company cafeteria.

You may not be leading a Fortune 500 company, and you may not be in charge of a major change effort, but you can still use symbols to communicate with impact. And you can start with how you arrange and use the furniture in your office.

First of all, make sure that your seating arrangements are congruent with your business objectives. If, for instance, you want to project authority or maintain control, sit in a larger or higher chair behind a desk – or at the head of a rectangular conference table. If you want to accentuate the adversarial nature of a situation, sit at a table, directly across from your competitors. (Think of the seating arrangement that would be typical for a meeting of a divorcing couple and their attorneys.) But if your goal is to enhance teamwork or build a culture of collaboration, get out from behind your desk and don’t put any object between you and the person with whom you’re talking.

If an organization wants its offices to say something that gets national attention, it could take a tip from this Canadian advertising agency: AdFarm uses office placement to symbolize organizational values. According to Art Froehlich, a senior partner with the firm: “In our company, the owners have windowless offices and staff members are assigned the nicer rooms with views. No one has a corner office. All of those are turned into meeting rooms. Using space like this is one way we communicate our values (in which relationships are primary) to employees and clients.”

I don’t think it’s coincidental that AdFarm was selected as one of the 50 best workplaces in Canada. Those offices were definitely speaking up!