Archive for August, 2009

Digital Brains

Monday, August 31st, 2009

There’s no doubt that digital technology is changing brains. Average IQ scores have been steadily rising and the ability to multitask without errors is improving. But as the modern brain continues to evolve and strengthen mental response time for many functions (like rapid fire cyber searches), the neural circuits that control human interaction and communication are weakening.

But, according to neuroscientists, we can intentionally alter brain wiring and reinvigorate some of these dwindling neural pathways, while keeping the newly evolved technology circuits.

Now, whether in a cyber search or an empathetic relationship, our synaptic responses can be measured and optimized. Good news for all of us in the digital age who realize the importance of social skills – including the ability to read nonverbal communication and use body language.

The body language of memory

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

According to researchers at Duke University, we’re not just attracted to people who smile at us; we also tend to remember their names.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the Duke researchers found that the orbitofrontal cortices (the region of the brain associated with reward processing) were more active when subjects were learning and recalling the names of smiling individuals.

Makes sense. We all want to remember people who were nice to us!

The importance of a bedside manner

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

My sister, Toni, had an appointment at the cancer center because her eye, nose and throat doctor sent her there. In a physical exam, the specialist had found a tumor on Toni’s vocal chord. He was 90% sure it was cancer and referred her to a cancer center in Seattle – over 100 miles from her Yakima, Washington home. And, as disturbing as this news was to Toni, it would certainly explain the hoarse voice and sore throat that had persisted for two months in despite doses of Penicillin and antibiotics.

But when the Seattle oncologist performed his exam, he came to a very different conclusion: “I don’t see what your other doctor saw. You have no tumor and no cancer.”

Those were wonderful words for Toni to hear. What was less than wonderful was the way they were delivered – curtly and, to my sister’s ear, as though the oncologist was upset about having wasted his time. And, as Toni sat, trying to absorb this new information, the doctor ordered a CAT scan, turned his back on her and abruptly left the room.

How important is the nonverbal aspect of the doctor-patient relationship?

It was hugely important for Toni. The doctor’s tone of voice (and subsequent behavior), totally overwhelmed his positive message. While Toni should have been euphoric, she was only relieved, stunned, and confused.

Too bad she wasn’t a patient in Ontario. There, the College of Physicians and Surgeons is starting a crusade for congeniality.

They’ve decided that their doctors do a good job of providing medical treatment, but don’t show enough friendly, reassuring body language.

Expert on Nonverbal Communication

Friday, August 7th, 2009

Edward Hall may not have been a household name, but to students of body language he was legendary. He died on August 5 at the age of 95.

His most influential book, “The Silent Language” (1959), outlined his theory of explicit versus informal forms of communication. But his most provocative ideas, developed when he was at the Illinois Institute of Technology in the 1960s, dealt with cultural attitudes toward space and time as part of the informal realm of communication.

It was he who coined the term “proxemics” to describe phenomena like territoriality among office workers and the cultural meanings of architecture.

A true pioneer in the field . . .

Emotional Contagion

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

It started out to be a wonderful day. The sun was shining and I was singing along with my favorite radio station while driving through unusually light traffic to the San Francisco airport. Then, as I was turning into the airport parking lot, a driver abruptly pulled in front of me and glared through his rearview mirror. At the ticket counter the airline employee frowned and sighed as I explained the need to make changes to my itinerary. By the time a scowling attendant took my airline ticket, I scowled right back. My good mood had been contaminated!

No one is immune to emotional contagion. Facial gestures and their underlying emotions (both positive and negative) are highly infectious and “catching” them is a universal human phenomenon. We all tend to mimic the facial expressions and reflect the mood of those with whom we have contact.  Getting a genuine smile can brighten up our day. And angry frowns are upsetting.

We’re hardwired to mimic expressions and emotions and have been doing so since infancy. Nine-month-old babies look longer at their mothers and express greater joy when their mothers are themselves joyful. One-year-olds, after watching a videotape of an actress portraying either positive or negative feelings, will mimic the actress’s expressions and alter their own emotions accordingly.

As adults, we remain susceptible. Swedish researchers found that merely seeing a picture of a happy face produces fleeting activity in the muscles that pull the mouth into a smile. In fact, whenever we look at a photograph of someone portraying any strong emotion, like sadness, disgust or joy, our facial muscles automatically start to mirror that expression. And it isn’t just a physical response, since our facial expressions will subtly trigger the corresponding feelings.

A business simulation experiment at Yale University gave two groups of people the assignment of deciding how much of a bonus to give each employee from a set fund of money. Each person in the group was to get as large a bonus as possible for certain employees, while being fair to the entire employee population.

In one group, the conflicting agendas led to stress and tension, while in the second group, everyone ended up feeling good about the result. The difference was in the “plants” – actors who had been secretly assigned to each group. In the first group, the actor was negative and downbeat — and in the second, positive and upbeat. The emotional tone of the meetings followed the lead of each actor – although none of the group members understood why his or her feelings had shifted.

In my change-management consulting, I’ve noticed that in times of organizational uncertainty, employees instinctively pay more attention to the facial expressions of those around them. People search for smiles or frowns to get a better sense of how to interpret and react to a situation, and then they begin to mimic the predominant emotions. When someone moans about an upcoming change or rants that the company is sure to go under, co-workers can be “infected” with a kind of collective anxiety about the future

Each of us gives and responds to hundreds of facial expressions daily — from co-workers’ grins to clenched-jaw displays around the conference table, Looked at another way, you are part of an emotional chain-reaction effect. Especially now, in challenging times, we need to make sure we’re part of te (positive emotion) solution, and not part of the problem.

Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D., is an author and keynote speaker who addresses association, government, and business audiences around the world. Her latest book and program topic is THE NONVERBAL ADVANTAGE – Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work.  For more information, contact Carol by phone: 510-526-1727, email: CGoman@CKG.com, or through her websites: www.CKG.com and www.NonverbalAdvantage.com.